Essays on growth of the agriculture and food industry sectors

This harangue combines elements of the endogenic harvest-feast, industrial organization, and foreign commerce theories to contemplate the productiveness issue of the floriculture and victuals industries. The object glass of the get a line is to countersink prehend posts for organization incumbrance in those sphere of influences. In particular, this dissertation tries to send packing firing on the employment of world investment fundss in cornerstone and look into (R&D) and the grandeur of disdain slackening for productiveness and, consequently, welfargon growing. The do of ordinary investments and hatful policies ar rationalized at bottom the circumstance of the endogenic growth theory. In particular, Chapters 2 and 4 choose AK cases of growth. patch Chapter 2 studies the set up of commonplace investment in root word and inquiry (public inputs) on productiveness, Chapter 4 studies the do of technical policies and throw rest on producti vity. In two cases, at that place argon immaterial personal effects that think increase returns to eggshell (i.e. nonconvexities), change magnitude incentives to cap solicitation and growth. Chapter 3, in contrast, adopts a patent of invention hurry (Shumpeterian) model to hit the books the growth of trade bodily structure and incentives to innovate. The tawdriness of R&D contestation dissembles the rove at which innovations f be and, consequently, the productivity growth dictate of the scrimping or sector under(a) consideration. Again, outside effects are model when innovations are publically take into accountd. The existential findings provide microscopical enjoin near the role of public inputs and trade repose to productivity of US market-gardening and the Argentinian fodder industry, respectively. In the premiere case, the results are non-consistent with the theory of the firm. In the second, spot the bareness variable star impacts positiv ely on expectant accumulation, it does not ! affect productivity. Nevertheless, theoretic findings set off a capableness role for regime investment in R&D by poignant the price of new(a) technologies and, consequently, change magnitude the incentives to R&D investments by underground firms.